Estes Sons v. Insurance Company

32 A. 775, 67 N.H. 597
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1893·Published

Opinion

Clark, J.

Upon the facts agreed, the plaintiffs are not entitled to judgment. It cannot be held, as matter of law, that Barker was the agent of the defendants, or that the defendants have waived or are estopped to insist upon the forfeiture clause in the policies.

Motion for judgment denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estes Sons v. Insurance Company, 32 A. 775, 67 N.H. 597 (N.H. 1893).

32 A. 775 (Estes Sons v. Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.