Estes Sons v. Insurance Company
32 A. 775, 67 N.H. 597
This text of 32 A. 775 (Estes Sons v. Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Estes Sons v. Insurance Company, 32 A. 775, 67 N.H. 597 (N.H. 1893).
Opinion
Upon the facts agreed, the plaintiffs are not entitled to judgment. It cannot be held, as matter of law, that Barker was the agent of the defendants, or that the defendants have waived or are estopped to insist upon the forfeiture clause in the policies.
Motion for judgment denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 A. 775, 67 N.H. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estes-sons-v-insurance-company-nh-1893.