Esterson v. Whitman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Esterson v. Whitman

131 N.Y.S. 1114

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 131 N.Y.S. 1114 (Esterson v. Whitman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Esterson v. Whitman, 131 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs appeal from an order denying a motion for a bill of particulars of certain allegations of the counterclaim. The learned court below denied all of the plaintiffs’ demands on the ground that they were “immaterial to the issues in suit.” It seems to us from an examination of the pleadings that the first seven demands should have been granted. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted as to the first seven demands, and in other respects denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs appeal from an order denying a motion for a bill of particulars of certain allegations of the counterclaim. The learned court below denied all of the plaintiffs’ demands on the ground that they were “immaterial to the issues in suit.” It seems to us from an examination of the pleadings that the first seven demands should have been granted. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted as to the first seven demands, and in other respects denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esterson-v-whitman-nyappterm-1911.