Estep v. State

206 So. 2d 668
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1968
DocketNo. 67-292
StatusPublished

This text of 206 So. 2d 668 (Estep v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estep v. State, 206 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying him a full eviden-tiary hearing on his motion. We have carefully considered all points presented by appellant on appeal and find him to be without merit. See Mangram v. State, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 243; Thompson v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 176 So.2d 564; Brookins v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 578; Shannon v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 479; and Marti v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 506.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. State
176 So. 2d 564 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Marti v. State
163 So. 2d 506 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Brookins v. State
174 So. 2d 578 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Shannon v. State
172 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Mangram v. State
179 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 So. 2d 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estep-v-state-fladistctapp-1968.