Estep v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Estep v. State

206 So. 2d 668

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 1968·No. No. 67-292·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying him a full eviden-tiary hearing on his motion. We have carefully considered all points presented by appellant on appeal and find him to be without merit. See Mangram v. State, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 243; Thompson v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 176 So.2d 564; Brookins v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 578; Shannon v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 479; and Marti v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 506.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying him a full eviden-tiary hearing on his motion. We have carefully considered all points presented by appellant on appeal and find him to be without merit. See Mangram v. State, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 243; Thompson v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 176 So.2d 564; Brookins v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 578; Shannon v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 479; and Marti v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 506.

Affirmed.

Estep v. State, 206 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

206 So. 2d 668 (Estep v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related