Estep v. State
This text of 206 So. 2d 668 (Estep v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.
It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying him a full eviden-tiary hearing on his motion. We have carefully considered all points presented by appellant on appeal and find him to be without merit. See Mangram v. State, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 243; Thompson v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 176 So.2d 564; Brookins v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 578; Shannon v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 479; and Marti v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 506.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 So. 2d 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estep-v-state-fladistctapp-1968.