Estep v. Burke

254 A.D. 929, 6 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8335

This text of 254 A.D. 929 (Estep v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estep v. Burke, 254 A.D. 929, 6 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile-bus negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 929, 6 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estep-v-burke-nyappdiv-1938.