Estep ex rel. Estep v. Perry
This text of 158 F.2d 796 (Estep ex rel. Estep v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case came on to be heard on appeal from the action of the district court in dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by appellant William Estep, on the relation of his wife, Dora L. Estep.
And it appearing that the appellant has not petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States to review the judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee construing the statutes of that state, and that the petitioner has fáiled to exhaust his remedies in the state courts. See Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114, 64 S.Ct. 448, 88 L.Ed. 572; McCrea v. Jackson, Warden, 6 Cir., 148 F.2d 193.
The judgment below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 F.2d 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estep-ex-rel-estep-v-perry-ca6-1946.