Estelle Pearce v. John J. Gusek

238 F.2d 270, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 194
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 15, 1956·No. 13137_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An automobile operated by defendant collided with the plaintiff, a pedestrian. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment, for the defendant, based upon a jury’s, verdict, in an action for personal injuries. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

BURGER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estelle Pearce v. John J. Gusek, 238 F.2d 270, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 194 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

238 F.2d 270 (Estelle Pearce v. John J. Gusek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.