Estella Tenney v. The A.B. & W. Transit Company

396 F.2d 821, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Estella Tenney v. The A.B. & W. Transit Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 364 F.2d 493
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 17, 1968·No. 12090·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This automobile accident case was here once before after the entry of judgment for the plaintiff. Convinced that mistake had been made in the findings, we reversed, but remanded for additional hearings and additional findings. * The essential facts sufficiently appear in our opinion at that time.

On remand neither party elected to offer additional testimony, whereupon the District Court, without altering its previous finding that the speed of the bus did not exceed fifteen miles per hour, re-entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the basis of conclusory findings that the speed of the bus was excessive, and that the lookout of the bus driver inadequate.

We find insufficient support in the record for these conclusory findings and no other basis on the present record to support the judgment in favor of the plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile which pulled out from a parking lot in front of the bus when the bus was only from fifty to sixty feet away, a violation of the right-of-way due the bus.

Reversed.

*

Tenney v. A. B. & W. Transit Co., 4 Cir., 364 F.2d 493.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estella Tenney v. The A.B. & W. Transit Company, 396 F.2d 821, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6499 (4th Cir. 1968).

396 F.2d 821 (Estella Tenney v. The A.B. & W. Transit Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estella Tenney v. The A.B. & W. Transit Company
364 F.2d 493 (Fourth Circuit, 1966)