Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 18, 2012
Docket13-11-00769-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance (Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00769-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

ESTEBANON BARNES AND SLESHIA NEAL, Appellants,

v.

EDDIE YAKLIN FORD LINCOLN MERCURY, LTD AND EDDIE YAKLIN F/L/M/, LTD D/B/A TRINITY ACCEPTANCE, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal, filed an appeal from a judgment

entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number

2011-DCV-0138-F. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have resolved the issues in dispute. Appellants request that this

Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against

the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties,

the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at

appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will

issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 18th day of October, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estebanon-barnes-and-sleshia-neal-v-eddie-yaklin-f-texapp-2012.