Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance
This text of Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance (Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00769-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
ESTEBANON BARNES AND SLESHIA NEAL, Appellants,
v.
EDDIE YAKLIN FORD LINCOLN MERCURY, LTD AND EDDIE YAKLIN F/L/M/, LTD D/B/A TRINITY ACCEPTANCE, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal, filed an appeal from a judgment
entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number
2011-DCV-0138-F. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have resolved the issues in dispute. Appellants request that this
Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against
the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties,
the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at
appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will
issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 18th day of October, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estebanon-barnes-and-sleshia-neal-v-eddie-yaklin-f-texapp-2012.