Esteban Hernandez-Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

581 F. App'x 670
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 30, 2014
Docket12-74060
StatusUnpublished

This text of 581 F. App'x 670 (Esteban Hernandez-Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Esteban Hernandez-Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr., 581 F. App'x 670 (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Josué Marin-Molina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Marin-Molina does not claim he was tortured in the past, but fears torture in Mexico primarily due his grandfather’s anti-drug activities as municipal president over 20 years ago, and because he has tattoos. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Marin-Molina’s CAT claim because he failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to Mexico. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir.2011) (concluding the record did not compel reversal of the agency’s denial of CAT where the petitioner’s claims of possible torture remained speculative). We reject Marin-Molina’s contentions that the agency ignored evidence, see Almaghzar v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 915, 922 (9th Cir.2006), or otherwise erred in analyzing his claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Xiao Fei Zheng v. Holder
644 F.3d 829 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Almaghzar v. Gonzales
457 F.3d 915 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
581 F. App'x 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esteban-hernandez-gomez-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2014.