Estate of William
This text of 206 P. 1116 (Estate of William) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1] It is the opinion of the court that there is enough evidence in this case to uphold the finding of the trial court that at the time of the making of the will the testatrix was not competent to remember her affairs sufficiently to make a will or to remember her relatives and keep the matter in mind long enough to complete the task. Upon that ground the judgment of the court below is affirmed.
The court expresses no opinion as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding that the will was not properly executed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Shaw, C. J., Lawlor, J., Wilbur, J., Lennon, J., Shurtleff, J., Sloane, J., and Richards, J., pro tem., concurred. *Page 664
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 P. 1116, 188 Cal. 663, 1922 Cal. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-william-cal-1922.