Estate of White

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Estate of White

18 A. 1088, 132 Pa. 17, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 760

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 20, 1890·No. No. 270·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The able and ingenious argument of the learned counsel for appellant has failed to convince us that there was any error in construing the will of Ambrose White. For reasons given in the opinion of the court below, we think the provisions of that instrument, so far as they relate to the present contention, were rightly construed, and the decree should not be disturbed.

Decree affirmed on the opinion of the court below, and appeal dismissed, at the costs of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The able and ingenious argument of the learned counsel for appellant has failed to convince us that there was any error in construing the will of Ambrose White. For reasons given in the opinion of the court below, we think the provisions of that instrument, so far as they relate to the present contention, were rightly construed, and the decree should not be disturbed.

Decree affirmed on the opinion of the court below, and appeal dismissed, at the costs of appellant.

Estate of White, 18 A. 1088, 132 Pa. 17, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 760 (Pa. 1890).

Pincite

18 A. 1088 (Estate of White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related