Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Estate of Weitzel v. City of Cuyahoga Falls

Estate of Weitzel v. City of Cuyahoga Falls

718 N.E.2d 921, 87 Ohio St. 3d 200
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 17, 1999·No. No. 98-190·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

[201] The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 451, 715 N.E.2d 1062.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Weitzel v. City of Cuyahoga Falls, 718 N.E.2d 921, 87 Ohio St. 3d 200 (Ohio 1999).

718 N.E.2d 921 (Estate of Weitzel v. City of Cuyahoga Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stevens v. Ackman
2001 Ohio 249 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Klein v. Portage County
745 N.E.2d 532 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000)
Tignor v. Franklin County B. of Commrs., Unpublished Decision (4-27-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
Hubbard v. Canton City School Board of Education
722 N.E.2d 1025 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.
2000 Ohio 260 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Estate of Weitzel v. Cuyahoga Falls.
1999 Ohio 24 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)