Estate of Weitzel v. City of Cuyahoga Falls

718 N.E.2d 921, 87 Ohio St. 3d 200
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 17, 1999
DocketNo. 98-190
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 718 N.E.2d 921 (Estate of Weitzel v. City of Cuyahoga Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Weitzel v. City of Cuyahoga Falls, 718 N.E.2d 921, 87 Ohio St. 3d 200 (Ohio 1999).

Opinions

[201]*201The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 451, 715 N.E.2d 1062.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stevens v. Ackman
2001 Ohio 249 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Klein v. Portage County
745 N.E.2d 532 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000)
Hubbard v. Canton City School Board of Education
722 N.E.2d 1025 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.
2000 Ohio 260 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Estate of Weitzel v. Cuyahoga Falls.
1999 Ohio 24 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 N.E.2d 921, 87 Ohio St. 3d 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-weitzel-v-city-of-cuyahoga-falls-ohio-1999.