ESTATE OF VIVIAN v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

ESTATE OF VIVIAN v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.

195 S.W.3d 444, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 954, 2006 WL 1737505

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 27, 2006

DocketED 87036

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 195 S.W.3d 444 (ESTATE OF VIVIAN v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ESTATE OF VIVIAN v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 195 S.W.3d 444, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 954, 2006 WL 1737505 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Life Care Centers of America, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s order 1 denying its Motion to Enforce Arbitration in a negligence action brought by the Estate of Evelyn Vivian. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. The trial court designated the order as final for purposes of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Life Care Centers of America, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s order 1 denying its Motion to Enforce Arbitration in a negligence action brought by the Estate of Evelyn Vivian. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. The trial court designated the order as final for purposes of appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 S.W.3d 444, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 954, 2006 WL 1737505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-vivian-v-life-care-centers-of-america-inc-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack