Estate of Vivian T. Lord v. Kobata
This text of Estate of Vivian T. Lord v. Kobata (Estate of Vivian T. Lord v. Kobata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 20-AUG-2024 08:23 AM Dkt. 88 ODSLJ
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
ESTATE OF VIVIAN T. LORD, by her Personal Representative WILLIAM H. GILLIAM, and WILLIAM H. GILLIAM, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LESLIE KOBATA, REGISTRAR, in his Official Capacity only; PORTER McGUIRE KIAKONA & CHOW, LLP; PORTER McGUIRE KIAKONA, LLP; FOREST B. JENKINS; CHANG NISHIOT SIA NAKAMURA GOYA; JEFFREY H.K. SIA; DOROTHY P.H. MEISNER; SHANA MAGUIRE; HAWAII FIRST, INC.; ASSOCIA, INC., dba ASSOCIA HAWAII; ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KUHIO SHORES AT POIPU, Defendants-Appellees
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.)
Upon review of the record, it appears that self- represented Plaintiffs-Appellants Vivian T. Lord, by Her Personal Representative William H. Gilliam, and William H. Gilliam, individually (together, Gilliam), appeal from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit's (Circuit Court) November 13, 2023 Amended Order Granting Defendants Porter McGuire Kiakona & Chow, LLP and Porter McGuire Kiakona, LLP's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Filed October 18, 2022 [Dkt No. 221] (Amended Order). However, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the Circuit Court has not entered a final, appealable order or NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
judgment. See Hawai#i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (2016); Hawai#i Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 54(b), 58; Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai#i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994). The Circuit Court did not grant Gilliam leave to file an interlocutory appeal. HRS § 641-1(b) (2016). The Amended Order also is not independently appealable under the collateral-order doctrine or the Forgay1 doctrine. See Siangco v. Kasadate, 77 Hawa#ii 157, 161, 883 P.2d 78, 82 (1994). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 20, 2024. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge
/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge
/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge
1 Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Estate of Vivian T. Lord v. Kobata, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-vivian-t-lord-v-kobata-hawapp-2024.