Estate of Ursula Kate Reed
This text of Estate of Ursula Kate Reed (Estate of Ursula Kate Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00053-CV
ESTATE OF URSULA KATE REED, DECEASED
------------
FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
Pro se Appellant Bonnye Reed filed her initial appellant’s brief with this
court on June 19, 2013. Because the brief did not comply with the rules of
appellate procedure, the court notified Appellant by letter dated June 20, 2013,
that she must file an amended brief by July 1, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 9, 38,
and 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 1. The court’s letter notified Appellant
that her failure to file an amended, compliant appellant’s brief could result in our
striking the noncompliant brief that had been filed, waiving noncomplying points,
or dismissing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3. On June
21, 2013, Appellant requested an extension of time to file an amended brief.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Appellee Kevin Hurst, Independent Executor of the Estate of Ursula Kate Reed,
filed a response in opposition to Appellant’s motion for extension of time, but the
court granted Appellant an extension to file her amended appellant’s brief by July
11, 2013. On July 16, 2013, Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal based
on Appellant’s alleged failure to comply with the rules of appellate procedure and
this court’s order to file an amended brief by July 11, 2013. In the motion to
dismiss, Appellee seeks dismissal of the appeal and damages for a frivolous
appeal under rule of appellate procedure 45.
Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED IN PART. Because
Appellant’s amended brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal but deny
Appellee’s request for damages. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f),
45.
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: August 8, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Estate of Ursula Kate Reed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-ursula-kate-reed-texapp-2013.