Estate of Turner

185 P. 171, 181 Cal. 467, 1919 Cal. LEXIS 374
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 24, 1919
DocketS. F. No. 9250.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 185 P. 171 (Estate of Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Turner, 185 P. 171, 181 Cal. 467, 1919 Cal. LEXIS 374 (Cal. 1919).

Opinion

[1] The application for a writ of prohibition is denied upon the ground that such objections as petitioner has to urge to the confirmation of the sale referred to in the petition should be presented to the superior court at the time fixed by the clerk of said court for the hearing of the application for confirmation. We cannot properly anticipate the action of the superior court in regard to such objections. It may be further noted that in the event of adverse action by the trial court, petitioner's remedy is by appeal. (See Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1068.)

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Callahan
237 Cal. App. 2d 818 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)
Finley v. Young
237 Cal. App. 2d 818 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 P. 171, 181 Cal. 467, 1919 Cal. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-turner-cal-1919.