Estate of Thomas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Estate of Thomas

39 A. 567, 184 Pa. 640, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 952

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 28, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 4·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The reasons given in the opinion of the learned court below for sustaining the demurrer in this case and refusing a bill of review are quite sufficient to sustain the action of the court, and we affirm the decree upon the opinion filed. We do not m'ean however to deny any rights of the petitioner which she may have by reason of a devastavit, or upon exceptions to the third or any subsequent account which may be filed. Upon those subjects we decide nothing except that all the rights of the petitioner are reserved.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The reasons given in the opinion of the learned court below for sustaining the demurrer in this case and refusing a bill of review are quite sufficient to sustain the action of the court, and we affirm the decree upon the opinion filed. We do not m'ean however to deny any rights of the petitioner which she may have by reason of a devastavit, or upon exceptions to the third or any subsequent account which may be filed. Upon those subjects we decide nothing except that all the rights of the petitioner are reserved.

Decree affirmed.

Estate of Thomas, 39 A. 567, 184 Pa. 640, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 952 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

39 A. 567 (Estate of Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related