Estate of Tessier

2 Coffey 362
CourtSuperior Court of California, County of San Francisco
DecidedOctober 22, 1895
DocketNo. 3092
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Coffey 362 (Estate of Tessier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Tessier, 2 Coffey 362 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

COFFEY, J.

The facts of this application, as shown by petition and proof are that Joanna Tessier died testate on or about the twelfth day of January, 1884, in said city and county of San Francisco, leaving real and personal property therein, and being at the time of her death a resident thereof ; that said deceased left a will, which was duly admitted to probate by said court on the eleventh day of February, A. D. 1884, and that thereafter, the executor named having renounced, letters of administration with said will annexed upon said estate were duly issued to L. F. George, who acted as such administrator until his death, to wit, on or about the first day or September, A. D. 1888; that upon the written request of Mrs. Delia A. Bell, the only issue of said decedent, [364]*364and due proceedings in that behalf, letters of administration with said will annexed upon said estate were duly issued by said court to the petitioner, L. J. Hardy, Jr., on the fifth day of September, A. D. 1888, and that he is still such administrator, and that said estate is not distributed; that on the twelfth day of February, A. D. 1884, due notice to the creditors of said decedent to present their claims against decedent, as required by law and- the order of said court, was published; that on the twenty-eighth day of February, A. D. 1884, an inventory and appraisement of said estate was filed as required by law; that more than seven years have elapsed since the appointment of the petitioner as such administrator and the publication of said notice to creditors; that on the twenty-seventh day of August, A. D. 1895, the petitioner filed an account as such administrator, of his administration of said estate, up to the first day of August, A. D. 1895, showing that there was in his hands as such administrator in cash the sum of $3,438.99 and certain real property described in the petitions; that said account was allowed and settled as filed; that all the debts of said decedent and of said estate, and all the expenses of the administration thereof thus far incurred, and all taxes that are due from said estate, have been paid and discharged, except the fees and commissions of the administrator; that the petitioner filed a supplemental report of his administration since August 1, 1895, to the twenty-third day of September, A. D. 1895; that said estate is now in a condition to be distributed to the petitioner as a trustee thereof under and pursuant to the provisions of said will; that it is provided in said will that the income of said estate shall be paid to Mrs. Delia A. Bell and Mabel F. White, now Mabel F. Sumner—Merced F. White, mentioned in said will as a devisee, having died when about seven years of age—during their joint lives; that said devisees Delia A. Bell and Mabel F. Sumner are alive, and that said estate cannot be distributed to them or either of them until the death of one of them; that by the provisions of said will a trust has been created, and said estate has been devised in trust, and the administrator is in legal effect named as a trustee in said will to carry out the terms thereof; that the residue of said estate now remaining in the hands of the [365]*365petitioner, as administrator, consists of the property described in the petition; that said estate was the separate property of said decedent, who died unmarried.

The prayer of the petitioner is that the residue of said estate, after payment of his fees and commissions, be distributed to him as a trustee under said will; that the administration of said estate be closed, and he be discharged from his trust as such administrator.

The petition is concurred in by the surviving beneficiaries named in the will.

The will is as follows:

“I, Joanna Tessier, of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California, being of sound and disposing mind and memory, do make, publish and declare this my last will and testament.
“First. I will and direct that all my just debts which may exist against me at my decease may be settled.
“Second. I will and direct that my executor hereinafter named enter into the possession of all my real estate and receive and receipt for all the rents, issues and profits thereof, and from the proceeds thereof pay all taxes, insurance, assessments and costs of repairs on said premises, and out of the residue of said rents and profits pay monthly to the Hibernia Bank, to be applied in liquidation of the mortgage held on my property, the monthly interest and one hundred dollars principal. '
“Third. After the payments provided for as aforesaid, I direct that the sum of fifty dollars be paid monthly to my daughter, Delia A. Bell; and fifty dollars to my grandchildren, Merced Funda White and Mabel Florence White, to be divided between them share and share alike, and in case of the death of either without issue the survivor to take the whole thereof.
“If at the end of every succeeding twelve months there shall remain any money so received unexpended, the same shall be divided into two equal parts, the one part to be paid to said Delia A. Bell, the other to said grandchildren equally. Said payments to said Delia A. Bell and to said grandchildren are to be continued during their natural lives. On the death [366]*366of either of said grandchildren without issue the survivor to take her share.
“On the death of Delia A. Bell I give and bequeath all my real and personal property to my said grandchildren, share and share alike, or to the survivor of said Delia A. Bell in ease of the death of either of said children.
“Fourth. In ease any of the buildings situated and being upon any of the lots of land owned by me shall be destroyed by fire, I direct that the land be sold and the proceeds of said sale, together with the money realized from the policy of insurance, be used in the purchase of other productive property.
“Fifth. I give and bequeath all my household property, consisting of furniture, bedding, etc., etc., to my said grandchildren share and share alike.
“Sixth. In case any money should be realized out of the foreclosure of the mortgage held by me on the property formerly owned by me situated on the easterly side of Waverly Place, I direct that the same be re-invested in the purchase of productive real estate in this city; and if said property is sold on a decree foreclosing said mortgage I authorize my said executor to purchase the same for the benefit of my estate, or, in case of bidders at the sale, to allow said property to be purchased by others as in his discretion may seem for the best interests of my estate.
“All rents received from the property at any time in the hands of my said executors is to be divided as provided aforesaid and in pursuance of and accordance with the provisions aforesaid.
“Seventh. I hereby nominate and appoint George W. Gibbs executor of this my last will and testament. I hereby revoke all former wills.”

Duly signed and witnessed July 19, 1882.

The administrator of said estate submits the proposition for a distribution to himself as a trustee of the residue of said estate.

A trust has been created by the will of said decedent ; whether it is an express or implied trust matters not.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Straus
77 P. 1122 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
In Re the Estate of Carter
64 P. 123 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
Bemmerly v. Woodard
68 P. 1017 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Hope v. Jones
24 Cal. 89 (California Supreme Court, 1864)
In re Estate of Miner
46 Cal. 564 (California Supreme Court, 1873)
In re Estate of Pritchett
51 Cal. 568 (California Supreme Court, 1877)
Hill v. Den
54 Cal. 6 (California Supreme Court, 1879)
Estate of Barton
55 Cal. 87 (California Supreme Court, 1880)
Estate of Hinckley
58 Cal. 457 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Estate of Dunne
58 Cal. 543 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
In re Rose
22 P. 86 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Smith v. Davis
27 P. 26 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Luco v. De Toro
27 P. 1082 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Hicks v. Varian
55 P. 897 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
In re Coursen's Estate
65 P. 965 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
In re Dewar's Estate
10 Mont. 422 (Montana Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Coffey 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-tessier-calsuppctsf-1895.