Estate of Taylor

16 Cal. 434
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 Cal. 434 (Estate of Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Taylor, 16 Cal. 434 (Cal. 1860).

Opinion

Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Cope, J. concurring.

After a careful reexamination of the question presented in this case, we adhere to the former opinion reported in 10 Cal. 482. That opinion was overlooked when the matter of Alderman’s Estate was before the Court, and the position taken in the latter case, that the administrator, holding a debt against the estate of his intestate, can pay him'self and claim a credit when he has never presented his claim for allowance to the Probate Judge, cannot be sustained under our statute. “All persons having claims ” against the deceased must present them for allowance—the executor or administrator to the Probate Judge alone— other creditors to the executor or administrator, and if allowed, to the Probate Judge also. If not thus presented within ten months after the publication of notice for the presentation, they are barred by the express provision of the statute. The requirement to make the presentation and the period within which it is to be made are the same, whether the claims be held by the executor or administrator, or by other creditors of the deceased.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Grant
43 P.2d 266 (California Supreme Court, 1935)
In Re Estate Long
100 P. 892 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Cal. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-taylor-cal-1860.