Estate of Talley v. Pfaff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Estate of Talley v. Pfaff

427 S.W.3d 842, 2014 WL 1225928, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 323

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 2014·No. No. ED 100176·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Pickens, acting as personal representative of the Estate of Zelma Mae Talley (“Estate”), appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Deidre Pfaff on her Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.1(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Pickens, acting as personal representative of the Estate of Zelma Mae Talley (“Estate”), appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Deidre Pfaff on her Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.1(b).

Estate of Talley v. Pfaff, 427 S.W.3d 842, 2014 WL 1225928, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 323 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

427 S.W.3d 842 (Estate of Talley v. Pfaff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.