Estate of Smith v. General Motors Corp
This text of 179 F. App'x 890 (Estate of Smith v. General Motors Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Estate of Wanda F. Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and granting General Motors Corp.’s motion for summary judgment in Smith’s civil action in which she alleged she suffered injuries due to the defective design of the seat belt of the car in which she was a passenger. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm summary judgment in favor of GM for the reasons stated by the district court. See Estate of Wanda F. Smith v. General Motors Corp., No. CA-03-147-2 (WD.Va. June 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 F. App'x 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-smith-v-general-motors-corp-ca4-2006.