Estate of Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Estate of Smith

41 A. 542, 188 Pa. 222, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 597

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 31, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 19·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The very able and exhaustive argument of the learned counsel for the appellant has not convinced us that there was any error in the decree, or in the opinion of the court below. As [234]*234it seems to us the decree is fully vindicated by the findings and conclusions contained in the opinion and on it we affirm the decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam,

The very able and exhaustive argument of the learned counsel for the appellant has not convinced us that there was any error in the decree, or in the opinion of the court below. As [234]*234it seems to us the decree is fully vindicated by the findings and conclusions contained in the opinion and on it we affirm the decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Estate of Smith, 41 A. 542, 188 Pa. 222, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 597 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

41 A. 542 (Estate of Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related