Estate of Siddall

36 A. 570, 180 Pa. 127, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 888
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 8, 1897·No. Appeal, No. 202·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Tbe single specification in this case charges error in dismissing exceptions to the adjudication and confirming the same absolutely. The main question was whether the disposition which testatrix made of her estate at the death of her daughters is violative of the rule against perpetuities. The learned court ■below in a concise and convincing opinion, to which little, if anything can be profitably added, rightfully held that it is not.

On that opinion the decree is affirmed, and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Siddall, 36 A. 570, 180 Pa. 127, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 888 (Pa. 1897).

36 A. 570 (Estate of Siddall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Potter's Estate
13 Pa. D. & C. 667 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1930)
Taylor's Estate
11 Pa. D. & C. 90 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1928)
Dorrance v. Dorrance
227 F. 679 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1915)
Packer's Estate
92 A. 65 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Freeman's Estate
35 Pa. Super. 185 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)