Estate of Scott Hultman v. County of Ventura

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedSeptember 10, 2021
Docket2:21-cv-06280
StatusUnknown

This text of Estate of Scott Hultman v. County of Ventura (Estate of Scott Hultman v. County of Ventura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Scott Hultman v. County of Ventura, (C.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 Mark R. Pachowicz (SBN 138108) Jennie Hendrickson (SBN 144562) 2 PACHOWICZ|GOLDENRING APLC 6050 Seahawk Street 3 Ventura, CA 93003-6622 4 Tel: (805) 987-4975 / Fax: (805) 987-4980 mark@pglaw.law 5 jennie@pglaw.law 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ESTATE OF SCOTT HULTMAN, DECEASED, THROUGH HIS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST, R.H., A MINOR BY AND 7 THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, REBECCA HULTMAN AND R.H., 8 INDIVIDUALLY, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM REBECCA HULTMAN 9 Sonia M. Mercado (SBN 117069) 10 SONIA MERCADO & ASSOCIATES 11 5711 W. Slauson Avenue, Suite 100 Culver City, CA 90230 12 Tel: (310) 410-2981/ Fax: (747) 264-1847 13 soniamer2002@yahoo.com 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff PAULA HULTMAN, INDIVIDUALLY 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 18 ESTATE OF SCOTT HULTMAN, Case No. 2:21-cv-06280-DSF-RAOx DECEASED, THROUGH HIS Assigned to Hon. Dale S. Fischer 19 SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST, R.H., A 20 MINOR BY AND THROUGH HIS DISCOVERY MATTER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, REBECCA 21 HULTMAN, et.al. Hon. Rozella A. Oliver Plaintiffs, 22 vs. JOINT STIPULATED 23 COUNTY OF VENTURA, a public DISCOVERY PROTECTIVE 24 entity; et.al. ORDER 25 Defendants. Complaint Filed: 08/4/2021 Trial Date: None Set 26 27 28 1 | ALL THE PARTIES TO THIS STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ARE AS 2 | FOLLOWS: 3] Mark R. Pachowicz (SBN 138108) 4 | Jennie Hendrickson (SBN 144562) mark@pglaw.law 5 | jennie@pglaw.law PACHOWICZ | GOLDENRING APLC 6 | 6050 Seahawk Street 7 | Ventura, CA 93003-6622 Tel: (805) 642-6702 / Fax: (805) 805-642-3145 g | Attorneys for Plaintiffs ESTATE OF SCOTT HULTMAN, DECEASED, THROUGH HIS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST, R.H., A MINOR BY AND 9 | THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, REBECCA HULTMAN AND R.H., INDIVIDUALLY, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM 10 | REBECCA HULTMAN Sonia M. Mercado (SBN 117069) D So feyalioo.com ONIA MERCADO SSOCIATES 13 | 2711 W.Slauson Ave., Suite 100 Culver City, California 90230 14 | Tel: 310.410.2981; Fax: 747-264-1841 Attorneys for Plaintiff PAULA HULTMAN 15 16 | PAUL B. BEACH (SBN 166265) beach@Ibaclaw.com i7 | JA , JR. (SBN 213796) jencheria Tac law corm 18 OCCO ZAMBITO, JR. (SBN 306115) rzambito@|baclaw.com 19 H ALLEN & CHOI, PC 100 W. Broadway, Suite 1200 0 Glendale, California 91210-1219 Tel:(818) 545-1925; Fax: (318) 545-1937 Attorneys for COUNTY OF VENTURA, VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, SHERIFF BILL AYUB, COMMANDER MIKE HARTMANN *2 | Peter G. Bertling (SBN 131602) 73 powers certling law group. Jemma Parker Saunders (SBN 227962) □□ ERTLING LAW GROUP, INC. 25 21 East Canon Perdido Street, Suite 204B Santa Barbara, CA 93101 76 | Direct: 805-879-7558; Fax: (805) 869-1597 Attorneys for WELLPATH MANAGEMENT INC., WELLPATH LLC, LEAH 7 JAMES, R.N., SARAH ALLBRIGHT, LMFT, CRISTA ARNOLD, R.N., DARCY DENNING R.N. # 28 -2- TOINT STIPTIT ATRN PROTRCTIVEA ORNER

1] 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 | proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 4 | disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 5 | be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 6 | enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 7 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 9 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment

10 under the applicable legal principles. 11 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This action is likely to involve the exchange of documents, items, or materials and other information that some of the parties maintain as confidential for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose 1D other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and 16 proprietary materials records contain sensitive and confidential information that | derives actual or potential value from not being generally known to the public and 18 | are the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain their confidentiality. Information 19 | produced in response to discovery requests to other parties may contain 20 | confidential or proprietary information, or may disclose information concerning 21 | highly sensitive and confidential financial information, or other confidential 22 | materials, including the sensitive information of third parties. Such records may 23 | include, but may not be limited to: 24 5 1) County of Ventura Defendants - Records concerning the overall 26 || description, design and/or layout of the interior of the Ventura County Main Jail (“Pre-Trial Detention Facility”) where Decedent was housed, photographs and/or # -3- TOINT STIPTIT ATRN PROTRCTIVEA ORNER

1 | video recordings of Decedent’s entrance, housing, and movement throughout the 2 | Pre-Trial Detention Facility, and photographs and/or video recordings of all 3 | interior areas within the Pre-Trial Detention Facility that are not accessible to the 4 | general public, including the overall design and layout of inmate housing units, 5 | safety cells, initial intake and booking areas, special housing units, inmate and 6 | security personnel movement corridors, and any monitoring stations housed by jail 7 security and/or medical staff. The County of Ventura believes, in good faith, that disclosure of the above materials concerning or reflective of the design and layout 9 of interior areas within the Pre-Trial Detention Facility without a protective order may compromise the safety and privacy of Defendants’ employees and third ° parties, including jail security, medical staff, and inmates, and effect the overall " operation of the jail. The County of Ventura believes, in good faith, that materials "2 that fall within the categories outlined above are the type protected by the Official Information Privilege, the right to privacy guaranteed in the Federal Constitution and contemplated by the federal courts based upon a legitimate need for jail 15 security, safety, privacy, and operational concerns, and thus, are Confidential and 16 | protected from public disclosure. 17 Additional County of Ventura documents likely to be exchanged include 18 | materials related to or regarding peace officers’ personnel files, records related to 19 | third parties not involved in this litigation (including materials containing sensitive 20 | and/or private information regarding third parties housed at the Ventura County 21 | Jail and/or victims of crime), materials and information concerning the initial 97 | intake and classification and housing of inmates, and portions of County of 93 | Ventura policies, procedures, manuals, and/or training materials that are not 4 | publicly available and relate specifically to jail security, the classification and 95 housing of inmates, and prevention of cell assignment manipulations by inmates. 6 The County of Ventura believes, in good faith, that materials that fall within the 7 categories outlined are the type protected by the Official Information Privilege, the

# _4- TOINT STIPTIT ATRN PROTRCTIVEA ORNER

1 | right to privacy guaranteed in the Federal Constitution, First Amendment, and 2 || contemplated by the federal courts based upon the legitimate need for jail security, 3 | safety, privacy, and operational concerns, and thus, are Confidential and protected 4 | from public disclosure. 5 2) Defendants Wellpath Management and Wellpath LLC, “WELLPATH” — 6 | Records and policies, procedures, manuals and or training materials that are not 7 publicly available and may be proprietary, investigation materials which may be related to the incident at issue, and documents which potentially identify third

9 party private and confidential medical information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
187 F.R.D. 576 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Estate of Scott Hultman v. County of Ventura, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-scott-hultman-v-county-of-ventura-cacd-2021.