Estate of Schleusener v. Stuart

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Estate of Schleusener v. Stuart

462 So. 2d 129, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 234, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12057

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 23, 1985

DocketNo. 85-67

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 462 So. 2d 129 (Estate of Schleusener v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estate of Schleusener v. Stuart, 462 So. 2d 129, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 234, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12057 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

BARKETT, Judge.

This petition for writ of certiorari seeks review of an order denying a motion for summary judgment.

Certiorari is available only when the petitioner is able to demonstrate both a departure from the essential requirements of law and the lack of an adequate remedy by direct appeal after final judgment. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. Parker, 417 So.2d 323, 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Siegel v. Abramowitz, 309 So.2d 234, 235 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Petitioner has a remedy by direct appeal.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI