Estate of Schleusener v. Stuart
462 So. 2d 129, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 234, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12057
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 1985·No. No. 85-67·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
This petition for writ of certiorari seeks review of an order denying a motion for summary judgment.
Certiorari is available only when the petitioner is able to demonstrate both a departure from the essential requirements of law and the lack of an adequate remedy by direct appeal after final judgment. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. Parker, 417 So.2d 323, 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Siegel v. Abramowitz, 309 So.2d 234, 235 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Petitioner has a remedy by direct appeal.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of Schleusener v. Stuart, 462 So. 2d 129, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 234, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12057 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
462 So. 2d 129 (Estate of Schleusener v. Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and EDWIN DIAZ v. THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL CIMINO
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
South Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Dupont
683 So. 2d 1135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)