Estate of Sauceda v. City of North Las Vegas
This text of 693 F. App'x 635 (Estate of Sauceda v. City of North Las Vegas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The district court’s summary judgment orders are VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court so that the court can consider the summary judgment issues in light of County of Los Angeles v. Mendez, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1539, 198 L.Ed.2d 52 (2017).
Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 F. App'x 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-sauceda-v-city-of-north-las-vegas-ca9-2017.