Estate of Sam Farkas, Inc. v. Dougherty County School System

342 S.E.2d 501, 178 Ga. App. 135, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1607
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 6, 1986
Docket72009
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 342 S.E.2d 501 (Estate of Sam Farkas, Inc. v. Dougherty County School System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Sam Farkas, Inc. v. Dougherty County School System, 342 S.E.2d 501, 178 Ga. App. 135, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1607 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Pope, Judge.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion in limine which prohibited appellant’s expert in this condemnation suit from testifying regarding a prior sale by an adjacent landowner to another condemning authority. Appellant argues such testimony is admissible when the appraiser uses the sale in arriving at an opinion regarding the property which is in dispute and when evidence of the sale is not introduced as direct evidence of a comparable sale. Appellant has supplied us only with the transcript of the hearing on the motion in limine. We do not have the transcript of the trial. Here, appellant would have this court render a ruling, in effect, on an abstract principle of law. Without a transcript of the trial we have no way of determining whether appellant was harmed by the ruling. “ ‘It is axiomatic in Georgia appellate law that an appellant, to secure a reversal, must show not only error but harm.’ [Cit.]” Clements v. Toombs County Hosp. Auth., 175 Ga. App. 651, 653-54 (334 SE2d 188) (1985). “Where there is no transcript of evidence before the *136 court, we must assume that the evidence authorized the ruling below. [Cit.]” Favors v. State, 173 Ga. App. 567 (327 SE2d 543) (1985). In any event, appellant’s enumeration of error has been decided adversely to it in the case of Jordan v. Dept. of Transp., 178 Ga. App. 133 (1) (342 SE2d 482) (1986). Therefore, we must affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Decided March 6, 1986. Richard D. Hall, for appellants. Marvin W. Mixon, Jesse W. Walters, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Center Court Sports & Fitness, LLC
657 S.E.2d 548 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Cornelius v. Lawrence
416 S.E.2d 115 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Lehman v. Zuckerman
400 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Anderson v. Chatham
379 S.E.2d 793 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Kilpatrick v. Foster
364 S.E.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Whisenaut v. Gray
364 S.E.2d 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Clark v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
363 S.E.2d 813 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Knight v. Gonzalez
352 S.E.2d 646 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 S.E.2d 501, 178 Ga. App. 135, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-sam-farkas-inc-v-dougherty-county-school-system-gactapp-1986.