Estate of Robert Muhammad v. William Gresley
This text of Estate of Robert Muhammad v. William Gresley (Estate of Robert Muhammad v. William Gresley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 27, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
159566-7 & (86)(96) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra YREVA MUHAMMAD, Personal Representative Richard H. Bernstein of the ESTATE OF ROBERT MUHAMMAD, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellant, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
v SC: 159566-7 COA: 341745, 343236 Kent CC: 16-001357-NO WILLIAM GRESLEY, MATTHEW KAMPS, SEBASTIEN LEBON, BERTRAND THIBAULT, MICHAEL CHAMPRENAULT, DANIEL MOORE, and NICOLAS PELFRENE, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for admission pro hac vice and to expand the record are DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 27, 2020 b0323 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Estate of Robert Muhammad v. William Gresley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-robert-muhammad-v-william-gresley-mich-2020.