Estate of Robbins v. Schilling
This text of 200 So. 2d 646 (Estate of Robbins v. Schilling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment entered against the estate of Florence N. Robbins, deceased, in an action on two promissory notes.
Appellant contends (1) that the trial court erred in striking the answer of the executor of the estate for his failure to pay the fee of the administrator ad litem, and (2) that the court erred in permitting the appellee-plaintiff to testify as to transactions with the deceased, Florence N. Robbins.
We find merit in both contentions and reverse. See § 90.05 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 So. 2d 646, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-robbins-v-schilling-fladistctapp-1967.