Estate of Riddle

1 Coffey 215
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco·Decided April 27, 1885·No. No. 1,209·Published

Opinion

COFFEY, J.

1. There is no petition on file here signed by David McClure or by his counsel. Grace Biddle’s application that David McClure be appointed is not sufficient, as the person to whom letters are issued must apply by his own petition, signed by himself or his counsel: Code Civ. Proc., secs. 1371, 1374.

The order of June 8, 1883, had no proper basis as required by the foregoing cited sections, and it must fall.

2. An additional bond should have been provided for in the order of sale of the real "estate: Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1389.

The objections to the confirmation of the sale are sustained; they cannot now be cured by amendment; there being no petition, there is nothing to amend.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Riddle, 1 Coffey 215 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1885).

1 Coffey 215 (Estate of Riddle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.