Estate of Richardson
19 A. 82, 132 Pa. 292, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 808
Opinion
This case is affirmed upon the opinion of the learned judge of the Orphans’ Court upon the exceptions.
Decree affirmed and the appeal dismissed-at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of Richardson, 19 A. 82, 132 Pa. 292, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 808 (Pa. 1890).
19 A. 82 (Estate of Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simon v. Simon
17 Pa. D. & C.3d 633 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1980)
Commonwealth ex rel. Alexander v. Alexander
289 A.2d 83 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Watt Estate
185 A.2d 781 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Gordon
254 P.2d 644 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)
Graver Estate
81 Pa. D. & C. 306 (Lehigh County Orphans' Court, 1952)
Pierotti v. Pierotti
98 N.E.2d 875 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1951)
Romanski Estate
47 A.2d 233 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Esenwein v. Esenwein
33 A.2d 675 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Commonwealth v. Custer
21 A.2d 524 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Sharpe v. Federal Window & Office Cleaning Co.
19 A.2d 509 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Livingston v. Livingston
267 N.W. 636 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1936)
In Re the Estate of Holben
93 Pa. Super. 472 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Ray v. Ray
10 Pa. D. & C. 733 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Cummings v. Huddleston
1924 OK 538 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Hilton's Estate
106 A. 69 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Bledsoe v. Seaman
95 P. 576 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1908)
Hahn v. King
33 So. 121 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1902)
Marvin v. Foster
63 N.W. 484 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1895)