Estate of Richard
39 A. 1117, 185 Pa. 155, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 684
Opinion
We find no error in this record that requires either a reversal [164]*164or modification of the decree from which this appeal was taken. So far as they are material to appellant’s contention, the learned judge’s findings of fact are sustained by the evidence, and his conclusions based on the controlling facts thus established are substantially correct. Extended discussion of the questions involved would serve no useful purpose.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of Richard, 39 A. 1117, 185 Pa. 155, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 684 (Pa. 1898).
39 A. 1117 (Estate of Richard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moats v. Thompson, Exrs.
129 A. 105 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Blaney's Estate
37 Pa. Super. 76 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)