Estate of Relph

198 P. 639, 185 Cal. 605, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 588
California Supreme Court·Decided May 2, 1921·No. Sac. No. 3257.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[1] The court is of the opinion that under the well-settled law of this state the order of the superior court of San Joaquin County, granting letters of administration, was an adjudication of the fact of residence of the deceased in that county, binding upon the whole world, unless vacated or set aside on direct attack, for all the purposes of the administration of the estate of the deceased, including the probate of any subsequently produced will.

The application for a writ of mandate to compel the superior court of Stanislaus County to proceed in the matter of the alleged will of the deceased is, therefore, denied.

All the Justices concurred.

*Page 606

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Relph, 198 P. 639, 185 Cal. 605, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 588 (Cal. 1921).

198 P. 639 (Estate of Relph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Brace
180 Cal. App. 2d 797 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)
Jordan v. Clausen
56 P.2d 240 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Estate of Bloom
2 P.2d 753 (California Supreme Court, 1931)
Holabird v. Superior Court
281 P. 108 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Estate of Barton
238 P. 681 (California Supreme Court, 1925)