Estate of Ramirez-Miranda v. Jake Taylor Farms

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJanuary 12, 2004
DocketI.C. NOS. 159110 191100
StatusPublished

This text of Estate of Ramirez-Miranda v. Jake Taylor Farms (Estate of Ramirez-Miranda v. Jake Taylor Farms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Ramirez-Miranda v. Jake Taylor Farms, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2004).

Opinion

***********
EVIDENTIARY MATTERS
At the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiff submitted the following:

a. A Copy of the North Carolina Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health file regarding Jake Taylor Farms which had been redacted pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-136(e), which was admitted into the record over defendants' objection, and marked as plaintiff's Exhibit (1);

b. An Industrial Commission Form 19, which was admitted into the record, and marked as plaintiff's Exhibit (2);

c. A photocopy of photographs of the decedent and family, which was admitted into the record, and marked as plaintiff's Exhibit (3);

d. A copy of the North Carolina Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health file regarding Jake Taylor Farms which had been redacted to a lesser extent than plaintiff's Exhibit (1) pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-136(e), which was admitted into the record over defendants' objection, and marked as plaintiff's Exhibit (4);

e. Department of Labor Safety Bulletins, which were admitted into the record over defendants' objection, and marked as collectively plaintiff's Exhibit (5);

f. Defendants' Amended Responses to Plaintiff's Interrogatories, which were admitted into the record, and marked as plaintiff's Exhibit (6), and;

g. Decedent's Time Sheets, which were admitted into the record, and marked collectively as plaintiff's Exhibit (7).

Also at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, defendants submitted plaintiff's Answers to Defendants' Interrogatories, which were admitted into the record, and marked collectively as Defendants' Exhibit (1), and a Map of the Area In Question, which was admitted into the record over plaintiff's objection, and marked as defendants' Exhibit (2).

Subsequent to the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, and following submission of briefs by the parties, the Deputy Commissioner filed an Order on November 27, 2002, denying plaintiff's motion, and ruling that the Industrial Commission did not have jurisdiction pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-136(e) to Order the Commissioner of Labor, in the exercise of her discretion, to turn over unredacted information in the Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health file regarding Jake Taylor Farms.

Also regarding the Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health file and a narrative report by an OSHA Investigator, Everett Puckett, defendants' objection to his testimony about said report on hearsay grounds was overruled, the report having been generated in the regular course of business of the Department of Labor.

The Full Commission finds the actions of the Deputy Commissioner with respect to these evidentiary matters were proper and therefore sustained.

***********
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Houser and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence or to amend the prior Opinion and Award, except for minor modifications. The Full Commission therefore affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner with minor modifications.

***********
The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties in a Pre-Trial Agreement that was admitted into the record and marked as Stipulated Exhibit (1):

STIPULATIONS
1. At the time of the injury that gave rise to this claim, the parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. At such time, an employment relationship existed between the deceased plaintiff-employee, hereinafter the "decedent", and Jake Taylor Farms.

3. At all relevant times herein, Jake Taylor Farms was insured, with Dennis Insurance Group on the risk.

4. At the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, the parties submitted a packet of records and Industrial Commission forms, which was admitted into the record and marked as Stipulated Exhibit (2). Subsequent to the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, upon order of the Deputy Commissioner, a packet of wage records of Jake Taylor Farms' employees was submitted, admitted into the record, and marked as Stipulated Exhibit (3).

5. The issues to be determined are as follows:

a. Whether decedent died in the course of and out of his employment with the Jake Taylor Farms;

b. Whether a presumption of compensability established in Pickrell v.Motor Convoy, Inc., 322 N.C. 363, 368 S.E.2d 582 (1988), arises in the circumstances of this case;

c. What, if any, benefits are the decedent's widow and five (5) children due under N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 97-38, 97-39, and 97-40;

d. If the decedents' dependents and his estate are entitled to any indemnification under the Act, whether those benefits should be increased by ten-percent (10%) pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-12 based upon causal relationship between the defendant employer's willful failure to comply with the OSHA regulations and the death of decedent;

e. Whether an administratix can make claim for benefits when the decedent's certificate of death indicates that he died on July 6, 2001 and June 26, 2001, was the date he was last employed by Jake Taylor Farms; and

f. Whether the Pickrell presumption applies to a deceased employee whose death certificate indicates that he died on July 6, 2001 and his last day of work was June 26, 2001 and his remains were found on property not owned or rented by the employer defendant.

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record and the reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACTS
1. At the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Luis Ramirez-Miranda, decedent's brother, who does not speak English, testified through an interpreter, Ms. Lucia A. Wilberding, who was duly sworn in that capacity.

2. Urbano Ramirez-Miranda, the decedent, was at all times relevant to this claim, a resident of Halifax County, North Carolina. He was born on June 16, 1967, in Guerrero, Mexico. As of the date of his death, the decedent was married to Zoila Cortes-Aguilar, and the couple had five children, Gloria Ramirez-Cortes, Juan Manuel Ramirez-Cortes, Francisco Ramirez — Cortes, Isaac Ramirez-Cortes, and Antonio Ramirez-Cortes. The decedent's widow and five children continued to live in Guerrero, Mexico, as of the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner.

3. On Sunday, June 24, 2001, decedent arrived at the Jake Taylor Farms' migrant labor camp looking for work. At that time, decedent used false identification that identified him as Luiz Ortega. Decedent met that day with Angel Hernandez, the camp supervisor, and was advised that he could begin working the following day, Monday, June 25, 2001. He worked all day Monday, June 25, 2001, without incident.

4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chrismon v. Guilford County
370 S.E.2d 579 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1988)
Pickrell v. Motor Convoy, Inc.
368 S.E.2d 582 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Estate of Ramirez-Miranda v. Jake Taylor Farms, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-ramirez-miranda-v-jake-taylor-farms-ncworkcompcom-2004.