Estate of Quesenberry v. Big Creek Underground
631 S.E.2d 234
Opinion
Case without published opinion. Affirmed; remanded for consideration of defendants' motion for attorneys' fees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of Quesenberry v. Big Creek Underground, 631 S.E.2d 234 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006).
631 S.E.2d 234 (Estate of Quesenberry v. Big Creek Underground) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.