Estate of Quesenberry v. Big Creek Underground

631 S.E.2d 234
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided July 25, 2006·No. No. COA05-1356.·Published

Opinion

Case without published opinion. Affirmed; remanded for consideration of defendants' motion for attorneys' fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Quesenberry v. Big Creek Underground, 631 S.E.2d 234 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006).

631 S.E.2d 234 (Estate of Quesenberry v. Big Creek Underground) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.