Estate of Paul C. Murphy III
This text of Estate of Paul C. Murphy III (Estate of Paul C. Murphy III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-21-00316-CV __________________
ESTATE OF PAUL C. MURPHY III
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19-37828-P __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Paul C. Murphy III, appellant, filed a notice of appeal from a final judgment,
which the trial court signed on August 31, 2021. The record shows the appellant paid
the filing fee required for the appeal.
On December 8, 2021, we notified the parties the Clerk’s Record had not been
filed because Murphy had not paid for or arranged to pay for the fees charged by the
County Clerk for preparing a Clerk’s Record. We also warned Murphy the appeal
would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless he established that he had
1 arranged to pay the County Clerk’s fee so that a Clerk’s Record could be filed in his
appeal or provided this Court with an explanation sufficient to show why he needed
more time to pay the County Clerk’s fees. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
On January 5, 2022, Murphy filed a motion to abate his appeal. In that motion,
he argued that objections lodged by other beneficiaries to the estate in the
proceedings in the trial court be sustained, the order that he was complaining about
in his appeal would be void, and the “appeal would no longer be necessary[,]”
allowing him and the Estate to avoid the costs. Two weeks later, Rita Murphy, the
appellee, moved to dismiss Murphy’s appeal when it appeared that Murphy had not
filed a Clerk’s Record to support his appeal
On January 20, 2022, we denied Murphy’s motion to abate his appeal. And
on January 31, 2022, the County Clerk notified the Court that Murphy had not made
the arrangements to pay for a Clerk’s Record in his appeal.
The record shows that the Court notified Murphy in December 2021 that the
appeal would be dismissed unless the Court received proof that he had made
satisfactory arrangements to pay the fees for the records required to support his
appeal with the County Clerk and with any court reporters. Given the absence of any
reasonable explanation explaining his failure to arrange for paying these fees, we
2 grant Rita Murphy’s motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we dismiss Paul C. Murphy
III’s appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3, 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on March 9, 2022 Opinion Delivered March 10, 2022
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Estate of Paul C. Murphy III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-paul-c-murphy-iii-texapp-2022.