Estate of Mrs. George Howard, Jr. (Vivian) v. Dr. John Harris

2024 Ark. App. 281
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedApril 24, 2024
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 Ark. App. 281 (Estate of Mrs. George Howard, Jr. (Vivian) v. Dr. John Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Mrs. George Howard, Jr. (Vivian) v. Dr. John Harris, 2024 Ark. App. 281 (Ark. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 281 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-22-605

Opinion Delivered April 24, 2024 ESTATE OF MRS. GEORGE HOWARD, JR. (VIVIAN) APPEAL FROM THE JEFFERSON COUNTY APPELLANT CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 35CV-21-588] V. HONORABLE ROBERT BYNUM GIBSON, DR. JOHN HARRIS JR., JUDGE

APPELLEE REMANDED TO SETTLE AND SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge

Risie Howard, administratrix for the estate of Mrs. George Howard, Jr. (“Estate”), appeals

from an order of the Jefferson County Circuit Court dismissing with prejudice Estate’s wrongful-

death action against Howard’s primary-care physician, Dr. John Harris. On appeal, Estate argues

that the circuit court erred in finding that (1) service of process was insufficient; (2) identical claims

were pending in two state courts; and (3) the voluntary dismissal of a prior federal case mandated

that dismissal be with prejudice. Finding the record before us deficient, we remand to settle and

supplement the record.

On July 14, 2021, Estate filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Arkansas against Baptist Health (A.K.A. Baptist Health Home Health Network); Diamond

Risk Insurance Co., L.L.C.; and three individually named defendants—Leah Willett, RN; Alicia

Brucks, speech language pathologist; and Jane Doe, a Baptist Home Health physical therapist. Estate asserted claims of fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, negligence, pain and suffering, failure

to diagnose, wrongful death, abuse, and loss of parental consortium. Estate voluntarily nonsuited

the federal complaint on July 27.1

Estate then filed a state action in the Pulaski County Circuit Court. On September 29, with

the Pulaski County case pending, Estate filed suit in another state court, the Jefferson County Circuit

Court. Dr. Harris moved to dismiss the Jefferson County action. On June 6, 2022, the circuit court

granted Dr. Harris’s motion to dismiss with prejudice. Estate now appeals.

On appeal, Estate makes several arguments, one of which is that the circuit court erred in

granting Dr. Harris’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(8). This

court has consistently held that Rule 12(b)(8) prohibits identical cases from proceeding in different

courts within the state.2 Here, the circuit court found that an action filed by Estate against the same

defendant—Dr. Harris—with identical claims was pending in Pulaski County. Estate contends that

the two pending state cases are not identical actions because neither the parties nor the claims are

identical. However, the complaint filed in the Pulaski County Circuit Court is absent from the

record. Such evidence is essential to our complete and thorough review of the issues on appeal.

Without the Pulaski County complaint, we are unable to determine whether the parties and/or

claims were identical in the two then pending cases. Further, Estate argues that the voluntary

dismissal of the federal case did not mandate that dismissal in the instant case be with prejudice. As

to this argument, we note that the record is missing the dismissal order granting Estate’s motion to

1This information is according to the appellate briefs and the order of dismissal in the instant case. The record before this court does not contain a dismissal order from the federal action. 2 Tortorich v. Tortorich, 324 Ark. 128, 919 S.W.2d 213 (1996).

2 nonsuit the federal case. Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 6(e) provides that if anything

material to either party is omitted from the record, this court may direct that the record be settled

and supplemented and that a supplemental record be certified and transmitted. Therefore, because

the record before us does not contain all the items necessary for our review, we remand the matter

to the circuit court to settle the record by including the complaint filed in the Pulaski County Circuit

Court action and the order granting dismissal in the federal case. Thereafter, Estate has fifteen

calendar days to settle and supplement the record on appeal.

Remanded to settle and supplement the record.

WOOD and HIXSON, JJ., agree.

Goerge Howard Jr. Legal Center, L.L.C., by: Risie Howard, for appellant.

Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP, by: Gary D. Marts, Jr., and Scott D. Provencher, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tortorich v. Tortorich
919 S.W.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 Ark. App. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-mrs-george-howard-jr-vivian-v-dr-john-harris-arkctapp-2024.