Estate of Monahan v. Am. States Ins.

93 Ohio St. 3d 1283
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 10, 2001
Docket01-1490
StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1283 (Estate of Monahan v. Am. States Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Monahan v. Am. States Ins., 93 Ohio St. 3d 1283 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

Certified State Law Question, No. 500CV1191. On preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6). The court will answer the following question certified by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division:

“Where parties to an insurance contract negotiate specific clauses limiting UM/UIM coverage by [1284]*1284way of an Ohio uninsured motorist coverage form, for instance, a subrogation clause and [an] ’excess insurance’ clause, but due to a deficiency in the offer, the UM/UIM coverage is provided by operation of law, are the limiting clauses in the Ohio uninsured motorist coverage form rendered invalid or does the provision of the UM/UIM coverage by operation of law only affect the amount of coverage provided?”

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., would answer the certified question as modified in the preliminary memorandum of American States Insurance Company et al. Moyer, C.J., and Resnick, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 Ohio St. 3d 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-monahan-v-am-states-ins-ohio-2001.