Estate of Mills v. Progressive American Insurance Co.

420 So. 2d 310, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20591
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 20, 1982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These appeals follow the return of our mandate in Cook v. Mills, 374 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The trial court granted final summary judgment in favor of [311] Home Indemnity Company and in favor of Summit Insurance Company of New York.1 We conclude the trial court erred in granting the summary judgments since a fair reading of the coverage provisions of the policies in question provided coverage to H. L. Mills Construction Company, of which Mills is undisputedly a member.

In view of our conclusion that both Home and Summit are liable, we reverse the summary judgment against Progressive American Insurance Company, the umbrella carrier. Progressive is liable only if the coverage limits of Home and Summit are exceeded. That is not the case here.

This cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein.

Reversed and remanded.

The summary judgment in favor of Stevenson Insurance Association, Inc., is affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Mills v. Progressive American Insurance Co., 420 So. 2d 310, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20591 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

420 So. 2d 310 (Estate of Mills v. Progressive American Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Capelouto v. Valley Forge Ins. Co.
990 P.2d 414 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1999)