Estate of Michael Wells v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 26, 2021
Docket161911
StatusPublished

This text of Estate of Michael Wells v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (Estate of Michael Wells v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Michael Wells v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, (Mich. 2021).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 26, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

161911 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh GREGORY WELLS, Personal Representative of Elizabeth M. Welch, the ESTATE OF MICHAEL WELLS, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 161911 COA: 348135 Macomb CC: 2017-003739-NI STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and JOSEPH NARRA, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 16, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief addressing: (1) whether the appellant’s underlying complaint in its action against the insureds is a “written instrument” under MCR 2.113(C)(1) (formerly MCR 2.113(F)(1)), a “pertinent part” of a written instrument under MCR 2.113(C)(1), or is otherwise part of “the pleadings” in this case such that the lower courts could properly consider it in the MCR 2.116(C)(8) analysis; (2) whether the Court of Appeals correctly concluded that the appellant’s pleadings showed the insureds knowingly provided alcohol to minors and that this knowing act was a proximate cause of the appellant’s damages; (3) whether pleading proximate causation is the equivalent of pleading that an act “created a direct risk of harm from which the consequences should reasonably have been expected by the insured,” Allstate Ins Co v McCarn, 466 Mich 277, 283 (2002); and (4) whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the Macomb Circuit Court’s grant of summary disposition to appellee State Farm under MCR 2.116(C)(8). See Frankenmuth Mut Ins Co v Masters, 460 Mich 105 (1999); Nabozny v Burkhardt, 461 Mich 471 (2000); Allstate, supra. The appellant’s brief shall be filed by August 30, 2021, with no extensions except upon a showing of good cause. In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. A 2

reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 26, 2021 a0323 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allstate Insurance v. McCarn
645 N.W.2d 20 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2002)
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Masters
595 N.W.2d 832 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1999)
Nabozny v. Burkhardt
606 N.W.2d 639 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Estate of Michael Wells v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-michael-wells-v-state-farm-fire-casualty-company-mich-2021.