Estate of McDermott v. Loftus
27 Kan. 68
Opinion
More than one year having intervened between the rendition of judgment in this case in the district [69] court and the filing of the petition in error in this court, this court is without jurisdiction to review such judgment, and the petition in error must therefore be dismissed. (Laws of 1881, ch. 126, §2.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of McDermott v. Loftus, 27 Kan. 68 (kan 1882).
27 Kan. 68 (Estate of McDermott v. Loftus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phillips v. Carson
119 P.2d 488 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1941)
Howard v. Arkansaw
1916 OK 703 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Byington v. Quinton
45 Kan. 188 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1891)
Dyal v. City of Topeka
35 Kan. 62 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1886)
Waddell v. Shears
28 Kan. 415 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1882)