Estate of Mary v. Allison v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

403 F. App'x 866
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 3, 2010
Docket10-1273
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 403 F. App'x 866 (Estate of Mary v. Allison v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Mary v. Allison v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 403 F. App'x 866 (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel B. Allison, II, individually and as the administrator of the Estate of Mary V. Allison, appeals from the tax court’s orders imposing sanctions on him and upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in the estate’s gift tax. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Estate of *867 Mary V. Allison v. Comm’r of IRS, Nos. 00-247; 00-714 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 12, 2009 & Dec. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allison v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
181 L. Ed. 2d 351 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
403 F. App'x 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-mary-v-allison-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca4-2010.