Estate of Lynch

1 Coffey 140
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco·Decided June 30, 1884·No. No. 3,079·Published

Opinion

COFFEY, J.

It is suggested, on behalf of executors that the petition for partial distribution is premature; that a year (the time to contest the validity of the will) should elapse before the application.

Under the authority of the Estate of Pritchett, 51 Cal. 568, the petition is not prematurely preferred, the essential facts and the principle of this matter corresponding to the facts and principle in that case. Petition granted.

The Buie that the Final Distribution of an estate may be had upon the settlement of the final account of the executor, or at any subsequent time (Estate of Thayer, 1 Cal. App. 104, 81 Pac. 658; McAdoo v. Sayre, 145 Cal. 344, 78 Pac. 874), was invoked in Re Pritchett, 51 Cal. 568, 52 Cal. 94, although the time for contesting the will had not yet expired.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Lynch, 1 Coffey 140 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1884).

1 Coffey 140 (Estate of Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laymance v. Utter
81 P. 658 (California Court of Appeal, 1905)
McAdoo v. Sayre
78 P. 874 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
In re Estate of Pritchett
51 Cal. 568 (California Supreme Court, 1877)
In re Pritchett
52 Cal. 94 (California Supreme Court, 1877)