Estate of Lynch

1 Coffey 140
CourtSuperior Court of California, County of San Francisco
DecidedJune 30, 1884
DocketNo. 3,079
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Coffey 140 (Estate of Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Lynch, 1 Coffey 140 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1884).

Opinion

COFFEY, J.

It is suggested, on behalf of executors that the petition for partial distribution is premature; that a year (the time to contest the validity of the will) should elapse before the application.

Under the authority of the Estate of Pritchett, 51 Cal. 568, the petition is not prematurely preferred, the essential facts and the principle of this matter corresponding to the facts and principle in that case. Petition granted.

The Buie that the Final Distribution of an estate may be had upon the settlement of the final account of the executor, or at any subsequent time (Estate of Thayer, 1 Cal. App. 104, 81 Pac. 658; McAdoo v. Sayre, 145 Cal. 344, 78 Pac. 874), was invoked in Re Pritchett, 51 Cal. 568, 52 Cal. 94, although the time for contesting the will had not yet expired.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laymance v. Utter
81 P. 658 (California Court of Appeal, 1905)
McAdoo v. Sayre
78 P. 874 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
In re Estate of Pritchett
51 Cal. 568 (California Supreme Court, 1877)
In re Pritchett
52 Cal. 94 (California Supreme Court, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Coffey 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-lynch-calsuppctsf-1884.