Estate of Leyman v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Supreme Court

Estate of Leyman v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

383 U.S. 832, 86 S. Ct. 1236

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 4, 1966·No. 385·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the consent of the Solicitor General and consideration of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court with instructions to remand it to the United States Tax Court for computation and imposition of civil fraud penalty in accordance with the provisions of Public Law 89-359, 80 Stat. 28.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon the consent of the Solicitor General and consideration of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court with instructions to remand it to the United States Tax Court for computation and imposition of civil fraud penalty in accordance with the provisions of Public Law 89-359, 80 Stat. 28.

Estate of Leyman v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 383 U.S. 832, 86 S. Ct. 1236 (1966).

Pincite

383 U.S. 832 (Estate of Leyman v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.