Estate of Levis
21 A. 242, 140 Pa. 179, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 825
Opinion
It does not follow that because a man is a drunkard he cannot make a will. This testator, for anything that appears, was entirely sober when he made his will, and possessed testamentary capacity. Nor is there sufficient evidence to submit to a jury that his will was the result of undue influence. The court below was right in refusing an issue.
Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of Levis, 21 A. 242, 140 Pa. 179, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 825 (Pa. 1891).
21 A. 242 (Estate of Levis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. Robinson
53 A. 253 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)