Estate of Lerner v. Commonwealth

392 A.2d 330, 38 Pa. Commw. 136, 1978 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1344
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 17, 1978·No. Appeal, No. 1339 C.D. 1977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam Opinion,

The only issue here is whether Appellant, Sidney S. Lerner, may require the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) to open hearings on a matter previously adjudicated by the Board and argued before and finally decided by this Court where he is unable to show new evidence which was unavailable at the time of the prior hearing. Our prior decision1 constituted a final adjudication of the issues and the Board properly concluded that it had no authority to grant a rehearing.

Accordingly, we

Order

And Now, this 17th day of October, 1978, the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board is affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Lerner v. Commonwealth, 392 A.2d 330, 38 Pa. Commw. 136, 1978 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1344 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

392 A.2d 330 (Estate of Lerner v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Visintin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
561 A.2d 372 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)