Estate of Kisecker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Estate of Kisecker

42 A. 886, 190 Pa. 476, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1047

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 27, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 301·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The paper in controversy was undoubtedly testamentary. It was to take effect after the death of the testator. It was in writing and was signed at the end thereof by the deceased. The opinion of the learned court below covers every contention of the appellant so fully, and so entirely to our satisfaction, that we affirm the decree for the reasons there stated.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The paper in controversy was undoubtedly testamentary. It was to take effect after the death of the testator. It was in writing and was signed at the end thereof by the deceased. The opinion of the learned court below covers every contention of the appellant so fully, and so entirely to our satisfaction, that we affirm the decree for the reasons there stated.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Estate of Kisecker, 42 A. 886, 190 Pa. 476, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1047 (Pa. 1899).

Pincite

42 A. 886 (Estate of Kisecker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related