ESTATE OF KINKADE v. Ott

279 S.W.3d 213, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, 2009 WL 230577
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 2009·No. WD 69625·Published

Opinion

*214 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elton Fay appeals from an order denying his request for additional attorney’s fees in connection with a discovery of assets proceeding. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ESTATE OF KINKADE v. Ott, 279 S.W.3d 213, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, 2009 WL 230577 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

279 S.W.3d 213 (ESTATE OF KINKADE v. Ott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.