Estate of Karen a MacAskill v. the Kroger Company

Michigan Supreme Court

Estate of Karen a MacAskill v. the Kroger Company

DecidedDecember 9, 2015

Docket151400

StatusPublished

This text of Estate of Karen a MacAskill v. the Kroger Company (Estate of Karen a MacAskill v. the Kroger Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estate of Karen a MacAskill v. the Kroger Company, (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 9, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra 151400 & (50) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, KIMBERLY L. SIMS, Successor Personal Justices Representative of the ESTATE OF KAREN A. MACASKILL, Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, v SC: 151400 COA: 319297 Macomb CC: 2013-001126-NO THE KROGER COMPANY and KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendants, and THE KROGER COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered. The application for leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 9, 2015 d1202 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 9, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra 151400 & (50) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, KIMBERLY L. SIMS, Successor Personal Justices Representative of the ESTATE OF KAREN A. MACASKILL, Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, v SC: 151400 COA: 319297 Macomb CC: 2013-001126-NO THE KROGER COMPANY and KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendants, and THE KROGER COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered. The application for leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 9, 2015 d1202 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Estate of Karen a MacAskill v. the Kroger Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-karen-a-macaskill-v-the-kroger-company-mich-2015.