Estate of Kane
40 A. 90, 185 Pa. 544, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 751
Opinion
Without assenting to all that was said by the learned judge who wrote for the court below, we all agree that his conclusion, on which the decree is based, is correct. There is nothing in the questions involved that requires discussion.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of Kane, 40 A. 90, 185 Pa. 544, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 751 (Pa. 1898).
40 A. 90 (Estate of Kane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peden Estate
185 A.2d 794 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Yeisley Estate
56 A.2d 205 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Hartman's Estate (No. 1)
182 A. 234 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Newport Trust Company v. Johnson
167 A. 128 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1933)
Lowrimore v. First Savings & Trust Co.
140 So. 887 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Arnold's Estate
94 A. 1076 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Anderson's Estate
89 A. 306 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Habecker's Estate
43 Pa. Super. 86 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Perry v. Scaife
105 N.W. 920 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1905)